Physical Layout of the Courtroom Sample for Students-MyAssignment

Questions: 1.Which Court did you attend?2.What were the Charges against the Defendant?3.Identify who was Present in the Courtroom4.Briefly, Describe the Physical layout of the Courtroom.5.Describe the Courtroom Procedures6.What was the Most Interesting thing you Observed during your visit?7.Define the Concepts of due Process and the Rule of Law. Answers: 1.I attended Brisbane court of Australia on 7th April 2017 because it has a trial session which perfectly fits my free time. I like to attend mental I'll court as it has a trail session which interests me a lot. There are cases of patients which are very new and intense and it attracts me to a great extent. The hearing occurred in room number 16 at 12:05 as the trial session began and the defendant Rafael john a 19-year-old boy of Australia is charged with cases of violence and property damage ("Case Type Master Report", 2017). The court of Australia is based according to the Queensland constitution system where the court judge takes a decision by constant research and evaluating results from the reports. Rafael john being charged for criminal offenses was called in court as he fought with the public for 4 consecutive years including damages of cars was started mentally ill as he has tolerated a lot during his school days which really scattered his mental equilibrium and he became ou t of the sink. 2.The defendant Rafael john of Australia is charged with doing criminal activities and contributing violence towards the community this has led to numerous loss to public and property. Rafael john on 2013 was caught by police for fighting and violating rules then in 2014 he was caught by police for damaging property of public (car), later in 2015 and 2017 he was again caught and charged for violence and fight which created hustle and bustle among the public making a tough situation. These situations were really offensive as the people being victimized were innocent because they weren't aware of the fact that Rafael was mentally sick. He had been committing violence and misbehavior since 5 years in Australia and causing the environment scenario ("Federal Courts What They Do", 2017). These offenses were really unacceptable by anyone as being caught by the public for 5 consecutive years and damaging cars were something very annoying to the general public who needed justice towards this but court being very diligent succeeded to bring out the facts of Rafael being psychologically ill. The best part was that Rafael was sent to a psychiatrist for treatment so that he do not again get into drugs and alcohol. This was a great decision by the court as the solution was being taken out rather than sending him to prison which could have made his mental condition even worse. 3.The Brisbane courtroom of people with mental cases who has problems mentally or psychologically was solved in this room where several people were present the court judge, the defendant Rafael john, doctor/psychiatrist khan, audience and I was present who witnessed the decision and preceding of the case (Richardson, 2017). The court judge played a significant role in deciding and bringing out an effective solution to solve the problems which Rafael john created since 5 years from 2013 to 2017 which has also scattered the havoc of Australia in many ways. The court judge carefully and calmly understood Rafael's problems according to his age and generation. As Rafael did damages and violence due to intoxication, drugs, etc. so the judge after evaluating the results of the doctor's reports and consulting with the teachers of his previous school and finding the problems the judge gave out their decisions, therefore, the court judge took great decisions by making his mental status stable and giving him a chance. On the other hand, Rafael's presence and his case gave a good lesson to everyone present in the court as his case has something which talked about drug addiction and its circumstances which are bad ("Queen Elizabeth II Courts of Law Brisbane", 2015). 4.The court is situated in Brisbane Australia and the constitution works under Queensland constitution system. The physical condition of the place was very nicely designed and people were really understanding who made out solutions to all the difficulties and problems of Rafael. The lawyers were very smart and efficient to bring out the results by doing Rafael's medical checkup or taking feedback from his school were really helpful in proving Rafael indirectly culprit due to his unintentional deeds ("A Short Guide to Courtrooms", 2017). The psychiatrist was very kind and helpful as they took the responsibility to take care of Rafael and do his mental checkup and treatment so that he could become good again. The accused Rafael was very guilty of his carelessness and mistakes which really made the people sad and angry as violence is really unacceptable but under his case and taking his circumstances into consideration he was started to go for treatment to avoid intoxication, alcohol, d rugs, and etc. The physical conditions of the court room added a lot to the case of Rafael because Queensland constitution system is very different than any other systems of Australia but here in Queensland looking at the cases and giving out decisions are very important as it's their responsibility to give a fair decision ("Roles of Courtroom Participants", 2011). 5.I feel the most important aspect of the courtroom was the trail session which was something essential to watch and understand. So as soon as the courtroom proceeded with the case it witnessed a share silence at the starting because people were shocked and took time to digest the case as a boy named Rafael who is just 19 years old gets into drugs and alcohol intake and creating social as well as mental problems which weren't acceptable at all (DINSMORE, 2017). The evidence was given by the victims along with the lawyers who kept on giving reports and the damages which Rafael did in past years. The preceding were very tricky and logical to understand because cases like these are very carefully and minutely judges taking everything into in mind the defendant's mentality, his past experiences, etc. The procedures were very simple of the courtroom but each procedure had meaning and rules which cannot be broken. These rules were very necessary to be followed to sit in the courtroom (IMME RGUT, 2007). 6.The most interesting thing about the court visit in the case of Rafael was when the school teachers send a report saying that he was also bullied and ragged in his school days which broke him into pieces and made his lose his self-confidence and esteem. He became a guy with no guts to fight back but instead when the bad time scores and the paths become narrower than and as narrow as he chose drugs and alcohol to fight his weakness and take revenge from the common public which wasn't at all good. The court judges and team jury members really understood his problems and gave him a solution so that what wrong things happened to him in past should not affect him in present. As we all know student bullying and ragging is ban and anyone doing so is illegal so the court understood that it wasn't his fault what happened to him in his school as he was very small that time. When one after another witness came with evidence and reports along them to prove Rafael's guilty was most interesting to see how he faced this tough situation and people were happy to see him accept his faults and decision to leave all his bad habits and become a gentleman in coming days were the highlight and most interesting part of the case visit. It was even more interesting when after evidence were given to judge and then judge reads it out and ask counter questions that moment makes everyone spell bound and we get goosebumps which were very critical situation I suppose. 7.The court of Queensland constitution system Brisbane Australia has a good rule of law which is trial session it gives a small go through practice and makes everything work under more professionalism these sessions happen before the final session of the court, when it comes to mental illness and a case related to it then constant research and practice is required to counter answer or attack the opponent is necessary. In the case of Rafael, the evidence and reports provided were true and honest which was followed by the rule of law of the court (Waldron, 2010). The court also has a rule that they cannot put an innocent person into prison similarly Rafael being not innocent as he committed crime by creating violence and damages to properties unintentional because his mentally sick and needs treatment so he can become a better person in future and support his family being so young he has all his life left which he really needed to become a good person with golden heart, but he needs to quit drinking and taking drugs which play an integral part in making him a good person. The best part was when Rafael himself accepted his mistakes then decided and agreed to overcome his fears and problems by going to a psychiatrist for treatment so that he becomes back to normal (Waldron, 2010). References A Short Guide to Courtrooms. (2017).About Courtroom. Retrieved from https://www.hukukiyardim.gov.tr/legal_aid/sayfalar/AboutCourtrooms.pdf Case Type Master Report. (2017).High Court Gov. Retrieved from https://highcourtchd.gov.in/sub_pages/top_menu/case_information/CASE_TYPE.pdf DINSMORE, M. (2017). TRIAL PRACTICE AND COURTROOM PROCEDURES.MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Retrieved from https://www.insd.uscourts.gov/sites/insd/files/Courtroom%20Procedures%20MJD.pdf Federal Courts What They Do. (2017).US Courts. Retrieved from https://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Employment/Literature/federal_courts_and_what_they_do.pdf IMMERGUT, K. (2007). MULTNOMAH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT.COURTROOM PROCEDURES. Retrieved from https://www.courts.oregon.gov/Multnomah/docs/Judges/Immergut/JudgeImmergut_CourtroomProcedures.pdf Queen Elizabeth II Courts of Law Brisbane. (2015).Aurecon. Retrieved from https://www.airah.org.au/Content_Files/Divisionmeetingpresentations/QLD/Qld-02-12-14.pdf Richardson, C. (2017). Symbolism in the Courtroom.Brisbane Courtroom. Retrieved from https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/187be0fc-0a99-5e1c-ecb0-07f556d1777a/1/02Whole.pdf Roles of Courtroom Participants. (2011).Public, Safety, Correction Security. Retrieved from https://data.cteunt.org/content/files/law/principles-law-public-safety-corrections-security/unit-3-court-roles-processes-and-procedures/3-01-roles-of-courtroom-participants/3.01-prin-roles-courtroom-participants.pdf Waldron, J. (2010). The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure.NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/13531083.pdf